06 Nov 11
Originally posted by Rajk999No i'm not shutting up. You're boring bullying tactics don't impress me.
Read this story and tell me what you think. Im sure you know better than to judge Christianity by what the OT said. You are well aware that Christ is the head of the Christian church ...
Read and shut up :
And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them. And the scribes a ...[text shortened]... d Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
(John 8:2-11)
[/i]
I'm actually interested in what a Christian who does think homosexuality is genetic and not a choice has to say.
06 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobYour pretense is also boring as well. The Bible is clear on what constitutes a sin.
No i'm not shutting up. You're boring bullying tactics don't impress me.
I'm actually interested in what a Christian who does think homosexuality is genetic and not a choice has to say.
Accept it or move on with your life.
Why does an atheist care what Christians think?
06 Nov 11
Originally posted by Proper KnobIf that is the case then "loving" Bible-God seems to have created them such that it would bring them misery should they avoid acting in the nature in which they were created - and damned as vile and twisted "sinners" if they don't.
So it's only homosexuals who have sex (anal sex) who are sinners? Those who are gay who don't partake are not sinners?
It's as though "loving" Bible-God is having a bit of fun at their expense.
Doesn't sound very loving to me!
06 Nov 11
Originally posted by Proper KnobSame for all types of human urges. They are all part of our genetic make-up. It is what we do with how we are made is what Christ will judge us on.
There's no pretense here, i was genuinely interested in what you had to say.
So it's not homosexuals who are sinners, but only those homosexuals who engage in anal sex. That's all i wanted to know.
People who overeat [ its is a sin to eat too much], are also under the influence of their genes. But they have to resist the desire to overeat.
Same guidelines from the Bible apply.
What I cannot understand is why do atheists need the consent of Christians to sin.
Go and sin all you want. What is the problem?? I dont get it.
06 Nov 11
2 edits
Originally posted by Rajk999What I cannot understand is why do atheists need the consent of Christians to sin.
Same for all types of human urges. They are all part of our genetic make-up. It is what we do with how we are made is what Christ will judge us on.
People who overeat [ its is a sin to eat too much], are also under the influence of their genes. But they have to resist the desire to overeat.
Same guidelines from the Bible apply.
What I cannot underst ...[text shortened]... consent of Christians to sin.
Go and sin all you want. What is the problem?? I dont get it.
Whatever gave you the idea i was asking for your consent? I was asking what you believed in relation to homosexuality. There is no 'problem', and there is nothing to 'get'.
Just to clarify, less than 1% of people who are obese are so because of a medical condition. The rest just wish they were in that 1% so they wouldn't have to take responsibility for their actions.
06 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobGlad to hear that. Go and sin all you like.
[b]What I cannot understand is why do atheists need the consent of Christians to sin.
Whatever gave you the idea i was asking for your consent? I was asking what you believed in relation to homosexuality. There is no 'problem', and there is nothing to 'get'.
Just to clarify, less than 1% of people who are obese are so because of a medical condi ...[text shortened]... t wish they were in that 1% so they wouldn't have to take responsibility for their actions.[/b]
God and the laws God sent through Christ wont change becase the laws of men change.
Maybe the same ratio applies to gays.
06 Nov 11
Originally posted by AgergThe problem here is not God but in your definition of what 'loving' constitutes.
If that is the case then "loving" Bible-God seems to have created them such that it would bring them misery should they avoid acting in the nature in which they were created - and damned as vile and twisted "sinners" if they don't.
It's as though "loving" Bible-God is having a bit of fun at their expense.
Doesn't sound very loving to me!
06 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Rajk999Go and sin all you like.
Glad to hear that. Go and sin all you like.
God and the laws God sent through Christ wont change becase the laws of men change.
Maybe the same ratio applies to gays.
I do and certainly will.
'Oh Lord, it is not the sins i have committed i regret, but those which i have had no opportunity to commit'
Ghalib.
06 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobI like your style. You want to sin be a man and stand up an sin like there is no tomorrow.
[b]Go and sin all you like.
I do and certainly will.
'Oh Lord, it is not the sins i have committed i regret, but those which i have had no opportunity to commit'
Ghalib.[/b]
I dislike those sissy-boys who want to have gay sex and dont have the balls [literally and figuratively] to stand up and go do it. They need everybodys permission and want the world to say its ok.
Clearly that is what this thread is all about.
06 Nov 11
Originally posted by Rajk999I have no problem with Bible-God being a dick so long as we agree that such is it's nature without abusing language. By any reasonable definition of the word, "loving" is not an attribute that is consistent with your notion of "God".
The problem here is not God but in your definition of what 'loving' constitutes.
Indeed what precisely is meant by Bible-God is loving??? 😕