Spirituality
08 Aug 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think "defilement of the flesh" might refer to things like Japanese soldiers sticking sticks up women's vaginas in Nanjing, or people raping children, infants or babies, or physically torturing people or forcing people to eat faeces or drink urine ~ none of which I need Hebrew mythology to tell me not to do. I don't think "defilement of the flesh" refers to smoking cigarettes. If these words have somehow helped you stop smoking, then good for you.
when you tell us why smoking cigarettes is not a defilement of the body as you have stated despite the heaps of evidence that were presented to you, let is know.
Originally posted by FMFdid i say its a waste of time trying to get you to reason rationally, yes i think i did. You appear to me to be incapable of rational thought.
I think "defilement of the flesh" might refer to things like Japanese soldiers sticking sticks up women's vaginas in Nanjing, or people raping children, infants or babies, or physically torturing people or forcing people to eat faeces or drink urine ~ none of which I need Hebrew mythology to tell me not to do. I don't think "defilement of the flesh" refers to smoking cigarettes. If these words have somehow helped you stop smoking, then good for you.
defile,
1. To make filthy or dirty; pollute: defile a river with sewage.
2. To debase the pureness or excellence of; corrupt: a country landscape that was defiled by urban sprawl.
3. To profane or sully (a reputation, for example).
4. To make unclean or unfit for ceremonial use; desecrate: defile a temple.
5. To violate the chastity of.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/defilement
Only one of which seems to fit your rather macabre scenario and even then its rather tenuous, pity that, so it seems rather conclusive, you are incapable of rational thought.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour opinion that your God figure has told you not to smoke cigarettes is absurd. But if it works for you, and you take what you have convinced yourself of seriously, good for you.
did i say its a waste of time trying to get you to reason rationally, yes i think i did. You appear to me to be incapable of rational thought.
defile,
1. To make filthy or dirty; pollute: defile a river with sewage.
2. To debase the pureness or excellence of; corrupt: a country landscape that was defiled by urban sprawl.
3. To profane or su ...[text shortened]... cabre scenario, pity that, so it seems rather conclusive, you are incapable of rational thought.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou are truly trying far too hard to be funny, robbie.
He didn't claim to have empirical evidence, your argument is a straw man argument, a misrepresentation and intellectually dishonest and a failure to think in a rational way. Its no wonder you slobber and drool your way through cyber space. Why are you stalking him?
Originally posted by FMFYou are still incapable of rational thought, no one has said my God has told me not to smoke cigarettes, your assertion that they have is further evidence that you are incapable of rational thought and really quite ludicrous.
Your opinion that your God figure has told you not to smoke cigarettes is absurd. But if it works for you, and you take what you have convinced yourself of seriously, good for you.
Originally posted by FMFI am not trying to be anything, although it is evident that you are incapable of rational thought, even deluding yourself that people are trying to be funny when they are not. When i am trying to be funny i put a smiley at the end of my sentences, for people like you that are incapable of rational thought, you know, so that they don't assume anything or delude themselves into projecting false values.
You are truly trying far too hard to be funny, robbie.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell OK, robbie, whatever. If in your opinion your God figure has not told you to stop smoking, then so be it. Have it whatever way you want.
You are still incapable of rational thought, no one has said my God has told me not to smoke cigarettes, your assertion that they have is further evidence that you are incapable of rational thought and really quite ludicrous.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell, if you're not trying to be funny, then what are you trying to be? Repeating the same catchphrases post after post after post, thread after thread after thread, certainly appears to be you attempting to be funny ~ or "amiable", as you yourself once put it. You certainly can't claim that you're being serious.
I am not trying to be anything, although it is evident that you are incapable of rational thought, even deluding yourself that people are trying to be funny when they are not. When i am trying to be funny i put a smiley at the end of my sentences, for people like you that are incapable of rational thought, you know, so that they don't assume anything or delude themselves into projecting false values.
Originally posted by FMFthat is the second time you have displayed a delusional tendency to project false values, a direct consequence of your inability to think rationally in all probability.
Well OK, robbie, whatever. If in your opinion your God figure has not told you to stop smoking, then so be it. Have it whatever way you want.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThese kinds of retorts just are not as funny or as effective as you seem to think they are.
that is the second time you have displayed a delusional tendency to project false values, a direct consequence of your inability to think rationally in all probability.
Originally posted by FMFOh i am being serious and as I have started here and elsewhere these terms are an appropriate summation of the content of posts devoid of substance and instead of writing, your posts are devoid of substance every time, i simply term them slobber and drool, because i like the connotations, the word pictures, it appeals to me imagination. If you don't like that then may i suggest you tell someone that cares, because, i certainly don't.
Well, if you're not trying to be funny, then what are you trying to be? Repeating the same catchphrases post after post after post, thread after thread after thread, certainly appears to be you attempting to be funny ~ or "amiable", as you yourself once put it. You certainly can't claim that you're being serious.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis kind of stuff just is not funny, robbie.
Oh i am being serious and as I have started here and elsewhere these terms are an appropriate summation of the content of posts devoid of substance and instead of writing, your posts are devoid of substance every time, i simply term them slobber and drool, because i like the connotations, the word pictures, it appeals to me imagination. If you don't like that then may i suggest you tell someone that cares, because, i certainly don't.
Originally posted by FMFill let you know when I am being funny by putting a smile at the end of my sentences so that people like you who are incapable of rational thought don't assume anything and i don't need to keep drawing attention to your slobbery drool.
These kinds of retorts just are not as funny or as effective as you seem to think they are.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNope. This isn't funny either. "Slobbery drool"? No. Not funny, as hard as you are trying. it just isn't working.
ill let you know when I am being funny by putting a smile at the end of my sentences so that people like you who are incapable of rational thought don't assume anything and i don't need to keep drawing attention to your slobbery drool.
Originally posted by FMFI am not trying to be funny, ill let you know when i am, so that you cannot assume anything. simply repeating the same falsehood again and again is what not very funny, but if its the best you can do then its the best you can do. Did i mention i think you are incapable of rational thought, seriously i do.
This kind of stuff just is not funny, robbie.