Spirituality
08 Aug 14
29 Aug 14
2 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou wannabe fit? 'Fit' for what exactly? And secondly 'strength is never a weakness', think about that for a moment.
sure they got all kinds of free weights and pulleys and cross trainers and machines but i don't want giants muscles, I wanna be fit, not strong.
Robert, you appear ignorant and out your depth. Building 'giant slabs of muscle' is something which requires a committed desire to a very intense training schedule and an adherence to a specific diet, and more often than not drugs, over many years. This is something you don't really needed to concern yourself with. To put it into chess terms, it's like saying - 'I don't want to play chess because I don't want to become an IM'.
29 Aug 14
Originally posted by Proper Knobfit so i don't die. My grandfather died in his fifties, my two uncles died in their thirties and the other had a triple by pass operation. All heart related. I see those poser boys at the gym with their skinny wee bodies and chocolate protein drinks, kissin their puny muscles in the gym mirrors. I just wanna be fit. I done manual labour for thirty years, i don't need muscles.
You wannabe fit? 'Fit' for what exactly? And secondly 'strength is never a weakness', think about that for a moment.
Robert, you appear ignorant and out your depth. Building 'giant slabs of muscle' is something which requires a committed desire to a very intense training schedule and an adherence to a specific diet, and more often than not drugs, over ...[text shortened]... ess terms, it's like saying - 'I don't want to play chess because I don't want to become an IM'.
29 Aug 14
Originally posted by divegeesterFeelin' mean aren't you?
I made an effort to engage with you on the thread topic and despite calling me out on not responding to you way back on page 37 you obviously have no opinion on the the topic anyway, no original thoughts regarding it's implications on fundamentalist Chritian beliefs and lack the willingness to explore other avenues of thinking about the issues in play. You are a timewaster.
I didn't call you out. I merely brought to your attention that I had replied to your OP because you lambasted me for not keeping pace with the thread.
I read through the thread and much of what was posted had nothing to do with the OP topic. So what?! Now you want to call me out about some imagined affront to you by me.
Whatever! 😕
30 Aug 14
1 edit
Originally posted by josephwDo you want to discuss the topic or not?
Feelin' mean aren't you?
I didn't call you out. I merely brought to your attention that I had replied to your OP because you lambasted me for not keeping pace with the thread.
I read through the thread and much of what was posted had nothing to do with the OP topic. So what?! Now you want to call me out about some imagined affront to you by me.
Whatever! 😕
🙂
30 Aug 14
Originally posted by divegeesterYou in a normal discusion? Really?
Do you want to discuss the topic or not?
🙂
RHP forum contract between Divegeester and whom it may concern:
#1. Cannot make any chess moves without responding to Divegeester on any forum within 15 minutes of that move.
#2. Cannot perform any secular work without responding to Divegeester with 30 minutes.
#3. One must inform Divegeester if one needs to excuse themselves to visit the toliet for any reason and when one will be returning.
#4. Must seek Divegeesters approval if one has to deal with any family matters no matter how serious it may be.
#5. Must agree with Divegeester on all subjects.
#6. If one does disagree with Divegeester on any subject, one must without arguement take any and all chastisement no matter how degrading it is, and as he explains his way to you, no disagreeing responces allowed.
#7. Must be willing to be labeled as a liar, false teacher, numbnuts, false prophet, idiot, etc, etc, or simply to be called whatever Divegeester sees fit for that day and accept that verbal lashing without responce.
#8 Must be willing to repeat an answer you have given him at least 30 times withing the first two days.
If he re words that same question, then all is void and the 30 answer rule starts over.
#9. If one knows one is dying in the near future, one must first run this by Divegeester for approval.
30 Aug 14
Originally posted by galveston75- "divegeester will be banned by the end of the day if he post one more thing that involves me."
You in a normal discusion? Really?
- "I've been trying my hardest to not report him"
- "Be careful what you say next."
- "stop the lies "now" or I will report you!!!!!!!!!!"
- "(((((( This is it, it's over and this is your last warning! )))))))"
- "Bad move dude..........It's done."
- "Maybe when divegeester comes back from his ban he will grow up and get a life."
Galveston75 ~ "Forum Etiqutte" thread
😵
30 Aug 14
Originally posted by divegeesterI see you liked my post? Nailed it didn't I?
[b]- "divegeester will be banned by the end of the day if he post one more thing that involves me."
- "I've been trying my hardest to not report him"
- "Be careful what you say next."
- "stop the lies "now" or I will report you!!!!!!!!!!"
- "(((((( This is it, it's over and this is your last warning! )))))))"
- "Bad move dude......... ...[text shortened]... ban he will grow up and get a life."
Galveston75 ~ "Forum Etiqutte" thread
😵[/b]