Go back
Too Proud & Stubborn

Too Proud & Stubborn

Spirituality

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
All men are created equal.
No they aren't. They are all different and not equal.

If you want to make the political assertion "All men ought to be equal in the eyes of the law etc." then I can completely agree with you, although I don't see how an opinion like that can be characterized as a "self-evident" truth.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Really? And exactly who belongs to this "privileged" class? You?
What "privileged class"?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Counterfeits. Deceptions. Lies.

The Truth stands undiluted and unchallenged by any other's life or words.
Liar.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
Are you claiming that Caucasian men have rights that simply don't apply to non-Caucasian men or women?
Which bit of what I said leads you to believe that this might be what I am claiming?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
Those aren't paradoxical situations.

You are an idiot.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37474
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I agree with you that all human beings [b]should have certain rights. But that does not make a slogan like "All men are created equal" true in a "self-evident" way. In the real world, they are all different and unequal at birth and throughout their lives, and the aspiration and idealism of "All men are created equal" simply has no impact on reality for most human beings.[/b]
What do you think fuels the frustration and anger of any class of men that finds themselves "under the thumb" of another? The knowledge that yes, all men ARE created equal, and all have rights, which are being trampled by others who feel that only they, by virtue of somehow being "better", are entitled to being called a human being with rights.

And you only perpetuate this thinking by calling some men "unequal" just because they have less than others.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37474
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Which bit of what I said leads you to believe that this might be what I am claiming?
You said as much.

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
You said you listen to The Truth when you hear it. But you later you said you can only hear when you listen. Definitely a catch 22.
You're quoting out of context, and misrepresenting what I said.

I do "hear" His voice, and you would hear it too if you would listen.

The words of Jesus are the words of life. Just listen to Him.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
All men are equal in the cradle. Or in their mother's womb.

They are created equal.

You always have to make everything more difficult than it is.
You need to read this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings

Supported by the Church for centuries.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
How much money a man has is no argument against all men being equal. A man is a man. They all put their pants on one leg at a time. They all only last maybe a month without food and at most a few days without water.

And they ALL have certain rights, simply by being a human being. This should be clear.
It is not made clear by any religion.

But I do agree with the sentiment.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37474
Clock
28 Nov 15
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
What "privileged class"?
Oh, come on!!

You are positing that no, men are NOT equal, so that means that yes, some are "better" than others, or somehow more "privileged".

So exactly who IS this "privileged" class?

josephw
A fun title

Scoffer Mocker

Joined
27 Sep 06
Moves
9958
Clock
28 Nov 15

Originally posted by FMF
No they aren't. They are all different and not equal.

If you want to make the political assertion "All men ought to be equal in the eyes of the law etc." then I can completely agree with you, although I don't see how an opinion like that can be characterized as a "self-evident" truth.
No. We are created equal. It's what happens after that that makes us unequal.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
What do you think fuels the frustration and anger of any class of men that finds themselves "under the thumb" of another? The knowledge that yes, all men ARE created equal, and all have rights, which are being trampled by others who feel that only they, by virtue of somehow being "better", are entitled to being called a human being with rights.

And you ...[text shortened]... perpetuate this thinking by calling some men "unequal" just because they have less than others.
If you seek to see the political demand "All men ought to be equal in the eyes of the law etc. right from the moment they are born", then I am with you all the way. But it's a slogan, and aspiration, a belief. I don't see how it can simply be described as "self-evident". It wasn't even "self-evident" in the minds of the first people who said that it was "self-evident".

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by josephw
No. We are created equal.
What is your evidence for this?

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37474
Clock
28 Nov 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
If you seek to see the political demand "All men ought to be equal in the eyes of the law etc. right from the moment they are born", then I am with you all the way. But it's a slogan, and aspiration, a belief. I don't see how it can simply be described as "self-evident". It wasn't even "self-evident" in the minds of the first people who said that it was "self-evident".
Oh, please. This is your anti-American sentiment talking.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.