Originally posted by twhiteheadNo.
Bit of a catch 22 isn't it?
A catch 22 means either option gives the same result. Like damned if you do or damned if you don't.
But The Truth is unequivocal. When one knows The Truth one is free, but when one knows not The Truth one is enslaved by Truth's counterfeit the lie.
28 Nov 15
Originally posted by josephwWhat about "The Truth" according to Hindus, Muslims and Jehovah's Witnesses, for example?
But The Truth is unequivocal. When one knows The Truth one is free, but when one knows not The Truth one is enslaved by Truth's counterfeit the lie.
Originally posted by FMF
Isn't it based on The Fact that it's self-evident?
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Thomas Jefferson
Originally posted by josephwNo it is not.
A catch 22 means either option gives the same result.
Catch 22 refers to paradoxical situations
For example;
banks only lending money to people who have money.
employers only taking on people with experience.
god proving his existence only to people who already believe in him.
being too unfit to exercise.
Originally posted by RJHindsThat was the guy who had all the slaves, right?We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Thomas Jefferson
Seems it was not so self-evident, even to the man himself.
28 Nov 15
Originally posted by SuzianneThat particular 'truth' (T.J.'s) is not self evident.
Some truths ARE "self-evident". TJ just found it expedient to abrogate his slaves' "unalienable" rights.
But then in my experience people who claim something is 'self evident' typically do so to avoid giving a rational explanation.