To me the Trinity is probably the biggest evidence that we are touching in God Someone totally not man-made.
When i contemplate the three-oneness of God as the Bible shows, I am assured that we have come in contact with the eternal and the Divine.
The truth of the Triune God is the biggest filter to act strain out man's boasting of his own powers of knowledge.
Mock on friends. This one is PELEH - Wonderful! (Isaiah 9:6)
No proud ones, I cannot explain how a born child is the Mighty God.
Nor can I fully explain how a SON given can be the Eternal Father of the Bible.
I can enjoy though, that such a Wonderful one is "UNTO US" .
Mock on now -- Robbie.
Rajk999 - mock on !
Mock on in your pride of your created limited human mind.
You mock. I'll enjoy God who is "unto us" for our experience.
Griffith Thomas founder of Dallas Theological Seminary wrote -
The threefold distinction in God, which is expressed by the word "Trinity," is the attempt of man to conceive and express the meaning of the Infinite God in terms of Jesus Christ, and we believe that the use of the phrase "The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit," is the very best rendering of the mystery that can be given .... The true meaning of Trinitarian doctrine, therefore, is not separate spheres o Divine operation in connection with each Person, but the united and inclusive operations of three Persons in one God .... When we turn to St. Paul, we find substantially the same set of ideas. The language about the indwelling of Christ and of the Spirit is practically indentical ...
Quoted from the same volume by Bill Freeman above.
Originally posted by sonshipYou are really kinda dumb because nowhere did I say that I perfectly understand Gods inner nature. Nobody is supposed to understand that.
Here is another example of some of the really stupid things you come up with.
The [b]New Testament itself speaks of "the great mystery" and "Christ the mystery of God". It also says that the serving ones in the church life should hold "the mystery of the faith".
So is Paul below your lofty level because he wrote "the glor ...[text shortened]... hat you perfectly understand God's inner nature doesn't impress me, if it impresses checkbaiter.
Originally posted by sonshipI don't mock anyone, I only speak what I believe to be the truth of the bible, common sense and what is logical.
To me the Trinity is probably the biggest evidence that we are touching in God Someone totally not man-made.
When i contemplate the three-oneness of God as the Bible shows, I am assured that we have come in contact with the eternal and the Divine.
The truth of the Triune God is the biggest filter to act strain out man's boasting of his own powers ...[text shortened]... irit is practically indentical ...[/quote]
Quoted from the same volume by Bill Freeman above.
I have already stated that I have many "Trinitarian" brothers and sisters whom I love dearly.
I do not try to force my views on them, but will not hesitate to speak what I believe.
Some of them have changed their view on many topics, including the Trinity, eternal suffering and on the dead being dead until the Lord returns.
BTW, God does want us to understand Him....
Jer 9:23-24
"Let not the wise man boast of his wisdom
or the strong man boast of his strength
or the rich man boast of his riches,
24 but let him who boasts boast about this:
that he understands and knows me,
that I am the Lord, who exercises kindness,
justice and righteousness on earth,
for in these I delight,"
declares the Lord.
NIV
Originally posted by checkbaiter
I don't mock anyone, I only speak what I believe to be the truth of the bible, common sense and what is logical.
I have already stated that I have many "Trinitarian" brothers and sisters whom I love dearly. I do not try to force my views on them, but will not hesitate to speak what I believe. Some of them have changed their view on many topics, including the Trinity, eternal suffering and on the dead being dead until the Lord returns.
Did they grow in Christ after you changed their minds? Did you minister to them more Christ ? Jesus was more dear to them after you caused a change in doctrinal opinion in them ?
Originally posted by checkbaiterIs that proof that God wants man to understand his inner nature as sohship claims?
BTW, God [b]does want us to understand Him....
Jer 9:23-24
"Let not the wise man boast of his wisdom
or the strong man boast of his strength
or the rich man boast of his riches,
24 but let him who boasts boast about this:
that he understands and knows me,
that I am the Lord, who exercises kindness,
justice and righteousness on earth,
for in these I delight,"
declares the Lord.
NIV
[/b]
I return to this matter of the pre-existing Christ.
Checkbaiter, if the Word became flesh, do you think that means that the Word came into being when Jesus was born ?
I believe that the Word was pre-existing before the birth and the Word became flesh in that birth. This has to mean Christ is pre-existent. This has to mean that Jesus Christ is in some way pre-existent.
This Person, now [edited] being born is in the world. It is the same Person. It is the same Person become flesh.
" He [the Word] was in the world [after the Word became flesh] and the world came into being through Him, yet the world did not know Him." (John 1:10)
Do you have two Persons? - the Word before He became flesh and the Word (a different Person) after He became flesh ?
This is ONE who went through a process of clothing Himself in creation. This is the One who was God - becoming flesh. He prays to the Father. He obeys the Father.
He was not another God from the God with Whom He was.
He was the same God as the God with Whom He was.
Your comment?
Originally posted by sonshipI think they identify with Christ the man in a deeper sense. They appreciate more fully his suffering and obedience
[quote] I don't mock anyone, I only speak what I believe to be the truth of the bible, common sense and what is logical.
I have already stated that I have many "Trinitarian" brothers and sisters whom I love dearly. I do not try to force my views on them, but will not hesitate to speak what I believe. Some of them have changed their view on many topics, inc ...[text shortened]... re Christ ? Jesus was more dear to them after you caused a change in doctrinal opinion in them ?
Originally posted by sonshipThis is where we part views. You are convinced the logos was a person. I believe it was a plan that was in the mind of God for Ages. This plan is what became flesh or was brought to fruition in the second Adam, Jesus Christ.
I return to this matter of the pre-existing Christ.
Checkbaiter, if the Word became flesh, do you think that means that the Word came into being when Jesus was born ?
I believe that the Word was pre-existing before the birth and the Word became flesh in that birth. This has to mean Christ is pre-existent. This has to mean that Jesus Christ is in s ...[text shortened]... the God with Whom He was.
He was the same God as the God with Whom He was.
Your comment?
Originally posted by checkbaiter
I think they identify with Christ the man in a deeper sense. They appreciate more fully his suffering and obedience
That is not exactly what I asked. Nevermind.
So you think to believe that Jesus Christ is the mingling of God and man as one Person reduces one's appreciation for His suffering as a man ?
I don't have this problem at all. Believing that Jesus is God, the Word become flesh, does not reduce my appreciation for His being hungry, or being tired, or weeping, or being surpirsed, or marveling, or being weary, or being tempted, or praying with strong crying and tears to the Father to save Him "out of death", or His suffering throughout His entire life or His suffering torment in crucifixion, or His bearing under the judgment of God.
Nothing about God being incarnated in Jesus Christ makes me think He did not partake of our nature and suffer.
In fact, seeing that He is God become man, a suffering man, for our sins, becoming a curse for us, all the more clarifies why the rejection of this One carries so severe a penalty as eternal separation from God in damnation.
You apparently view God becoming a man in incarnation, to allow this Person some form of free pass that He is not subject to the woes that a man could be subject. You find that incarnation of God as a man some kind of concept of "cheating" with an unfair advantage.
I don't see it this way at all.
Originally posted by checkbaiter
This is where we part views. You are convinced the logos was a person.
When John says concerning the Logos - "He was in the beginning with God" (John 1:2) that is not a Person ?
"He was in the beginning with God." (v.2)
Who is the He?
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (v.1)
Isn't the Word Someone ? Isn't He Someone Who was with God and was that God? God is "Person". Right?
I believe it was a plan that was in the mind of God for Ages. This plan is what became flesh or was brought to fruition in the second Adam, Jesus Christ.
In First John this Word is called the "Word of life".
What life ?
" ... which we beheld and our hands handled, concerning the Word of life.
(And the life was manifested , and we have seen and testify and report to you the eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us." ) ( 1 John 1b,2)
Are you saying "the eternal life which was with the Father" was not a Living SOMEONE ?
God did not create Wisdom. Wisdom is of His own life - an eternal Someone with eternal Wisdom.
Originally posted by checkbaiterI dont have to decide. The passage says to understand and to know that He exercise lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness, in the earth: God is happy when people do that.
It says understand Him. You decide what it means.
Trying to figure out beyond that like sonship does, and believing that there is virtue is this going off on a tangent kind of understanding is where people go astray.
Originally posted by Rajk999I know the context, but did you miss this part?
I dont have to decide. The passage says to understand and to know that He exercise lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness, in the earth: God is happy when people do that.
Trying to figure out beyond that like sonship does, and believing that there is virtue is this going off on a tangent kind of understanding is where people go astray.
that he understands and knows me