What will be the fuel?

Originally posted by @sonship
Then you have to backpeddle on your philosophy that all burden of proof is on the truth claim making theist and you are just a super passive "no belief" position - "atheist."

What are you on about now?

Originally posted by @sonship
If you turn out to be wrong and there is God,
wouldn't it be His mercy to reveal less of Himself to you, if He knows:

1.) You're never going to want Him.

2.) The more you know about Him the more guilty you'd be for your sins.

"Guilty" of what?

Originally posted by @fmf
If you want to talk about morality fine. But I don't see how stuff you imagine or that happens to appeal to your imagination creates any moral dilemma for me. As long as you frame right and wrong in terms of being "sins" rather than the walk the walk reality of living life in a morally sound way, you are operating on a landscape of superstition and preoccupatio ...[text shortened]... tifying rhetorical gimmick earlier and your ruffled indignation in reply to a very simple point.

No use in characterizing your dodge as my ruffled indignation or whatever.

Do you believe that there is a greatest possible wrong doing ?

IF God exists wouldn't it be right of Him to inform us in terms that we can understand that there is a greatest possible wrong doing?

Its a hypothetical question for you ... IF ... God exists.

If you claim that you KNOW God doesn't you're are no longer one with a LACK of belief in something. You are making a positive truth claim that you KNOW God does not and could not EVER exist.

That is more than "I lack belief".

Originally posted by @fmf
"Guilty" of what?

IF God exists as the Bible describes God and it turns out that way, then evil can be done by you.

Are you saying that you could be an actor of evil yet be guiltless?

Do you hold that philosophy for just yourself alone or also equally for everyone else who wrongs you?

Originally posted by @sonship
Do you believe that there is a greatest possible wrong doing ?

Mass murder on some "greatest possible" scale.

Originally posted by @fmf
Mass murder on some "greatest possible" scale.

Could you make that a complete sentence for me so that there is no misunderstanding?

Originally posted by @sonship
IF God exists wouldn't it be right of Him to inform us in terms that we can understand that there is a greatest possible wrong doing?

What is the "greatest possible wrongdoing" according to your own personal superstitious mind map, sonship?

Originally posted by @fmf
"Guilty" of what?

Do you believe that guilt for wrong doing does not exist?

Originally posted by @sonship
Could you make that a complete sentence for me so that there is no misunderstanding?

How have you misunderstood it?

Originally posted by @sonship
Are you saying that you could be an actor of evil yet be guiltless?

You already know what my definition of "evil" is. So your question is [a deliberate?] non-sequitur.

Originally posted by @sonship
Do you believe that guilt for wrong doing does not exist?

You are not going to bluster your way out of this conversation with calculatedly silly questions.

Originally posted by @fmf
What is the "greatest possible wrongdoing" according to your own personal superstitious mind map, sonship?

Graduate from clever innuendos.

You don't know that I have a personal superstitious mind map about God.

Why cannot your "no guilt for wrong doing" be superstitious of YOU?

Do you treat everybody who offends you as there being no such thing as guilt?

Originally posted by @sonship
You are making a positive truth claim that you KNOW God does not and could not EVER exist.

I have never said "I know God does not exist", and I have never claimed that "God could not ever exist", I am just not a Christian. Nor am I Muslim or a Jew or a Hindu.

Originally posted by @sonship
You don't know that I have a personal superstitious mind map about God.

It's all you ever talk about.

Originally posted by @fmf
You are not going to bluster your way out of this conversation with calculatedly silly questions.

I expect you next to point to the distance foggy past and claim that you've answered before.

Are you making now a positive truth claim that you KNOW a Saving and Judging God as the Bible reveals does not and cannot exist?

Are you now making that truth claim?