What will be the fuel?

Originally posted by @sonship
Can in any instance the propagation of ideas be of true ideas?

Sure. This isn't in dispute at all, sonship.

Originally posted by @fmf
To propagate simply means to spread and promote an idea, theory, etc. widely.

So it is possible that I as a Christian theist propagate what is true or at least contains some truth ?

If not, how do you KNOW it cannot contain any truth ?

Because you don't like it?

Originally posted by @sonship
I "propagate" - [b]Genesis 1:1. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

Beginning - of time.
Heavens - space.
And earth - matter.

You have a better explanation about an eternally existing heavens and earth and NO beginning of time? [/b]

I am not a Muslim or a Jew or a Christian, sonship. So I don't subscribe to "Genesis". And I do not know the age of the origin of the universe.

Originally posted by @sonship
So it is possible that I as a Christian theist propagate what is true or at least contains some truth ?

Of course. I have never said anything to gainsay this. You're being silly.

Originally posted by @fmf
Sure. This isn't in dispute at all, sonship.

Then you need not include those remarks because they are only emotional buttons. They really don't pertain to what is being discussed.

Stop appealing to them if they are not in dispute.

What IS in dispute - Explain an eternally existing universe that has NOT run down, run out, grown cold, turned to ashes in the blackness of space by now.

That is for endless ions and trillions of millennia it has not run down by now.

Originally posted by @sonship
Explain an eternally existing universe that has NOT run down, run out, grown cold, turned to ashes in the blackness of space by now.

You have my response to this.

Originally posted by @sonship
Then you need not include those remarks because they are only emotional buttons.

What remarks should I not include? Be specific.

Originally posted by @sonship
Stop appealing to them if they are not in dispute

Appealing to what? What is "them"?

Originally posted by @fmf
You have my response to this.

Link me to your reply please.

Originally posted by @sonship
Link me to your reply please.

You are being dishonest.

Originally posted by @fmf
What remarks should I not include? Be specific.

Back to what is important.

Who would you think in history might display characteristics of someone who might possibly be a candidate for a Creator IF there was one ?

No one?
Stephen Hawking?
Einstien?
Christopher Hitchens?
You?

Any candidates from world history ?
I mean candidates whose lives demonstrate that they just might KNOW about creating universes.

No one?

Originally posted by @sonship
Back to what is important.

What remarks should I not include? Be specific.

Originally posted by @fmf
You are being dishonest.

Link me to your reply if you answered it.
Simple solution.

Originally posted by @sonship
Who would you think in history might display characteristics of someone who might possibly be a candidate for a Creator IF there was one ?

I don't have any opinion or belief about this.

Originally posted by @sonship
Explain an eternally existing universe that has NOT run down, run out, grown cold, turned to ashes in the blackness of space by now.

You have already had my response to this. Go look at it.