‘Eternal suffering’ is nonsensical

Originally posted by @romans1009
<What I’m interested in is how you reconcile incoherence of Jesus torturing people in eternal suffering with scriptures such as John 3:16 for example?>

It’s really pretty simple. God doesn’t owe man anything. God doesn’t need man for anything. God is completely holy and despises sin. He does not want *unforgiven sin* in heaven. He has told man through ...[text shortened]... even more brazen and foolish to think you can dictate the terms by which you enter God’s house.

Originally posted by @divegeester
I was speaking to Jacob Verville.

Are you no longer ignoring me?

Originally posted by @dj2becker to divegeester
If you are asking serious questions and have abandoned your trolling I see no reason for him to ignore your posts.

Originally posted by @fmf
Aside from divegeester, do you think Romans1009 has been trolling as well, especially on the Evidence Please thread?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Do you think Divegeester has been trolling at all? Yes or No?

Originally posted by @fmf
Not really, no. Do you think Romans1009 has been trolling or is it only divegeester?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Not really no.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think divegeester is trolling?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I think you are smart enough to work the answer to that out based upon what I have said before.

Originally posted by @fmf
I haven't accused divegeester of trolling and I haven't accused Romans1009 of trolling. I am consistent. If you don't think Romans1009 is trolling, why do you see divegeester as trolling? Are you reading the things that they are saying to each other? You don't seem consistent.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
When it comes to divegeester for some reason I don't think you can be objective. Maybe it is because you are mates and have spent time drinking together. I think continually insisting that someone is being dishonest without proof amounts to trolling. You are free to disagree.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think you are "objective" about Romans1009 "objective" about divegeester?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
When it comes to divegeester for some reason I don't think you can be objective.

Originally posted by @fmf
Do you think you can be "objective" about divegeester after all the run-ins you have had with him?

I think it's time for me to stop. I think I am giving dj2becjer exactly the kind of attention he craves.