@shavixmir saidAren't you here for the laughs Shag, I asked No1. what the plan was, he made up a preposterous exaggeration, wrapped some quote marks around it as if it were an admission from someone and then we find out he was quoting himself, now that's funny.
Fukking retard.
But it does high light the resolve and integrity of people like Biggs, you can bet he's been offered a deal to make a false confession, to lie, and he's held firm at a cost of years of his life, a hero. What price do you put on honesty Pseud Boy, an extra candy bar from the canteen? or not even that?
@wajoma said"Preposterous exaggeration"? It's precisely what was done!
Aren't you here for the laughs Shag, I asked No1. what the plan was, he made up a preposterous exaggeration, wrapped some quote marks around it as if it were an admission from someone and then we find out he was quoting himself, now that's funny.
But it does high light the resolve and integrity of people like Biggs, you can bet he's been offered a deal to make a false confe ...[text shortened]... What price do you put on honesty Pseud Boy, an extra candy bar from the canteen? or not even that?
Obviously you put zero price on honesty as you keep dishonestly pretending that Biggs and the rest didn't have a plan even though they directly referenced one.
What I used was an indirect quotation or restatement of what the plan was; I didn't intend it to be a direct quotation obviously.
@no1marauder saidYou were quoting yourself, and this has already been acknowledged two times previously, making this the third time.
"Preposterous exaggeration"? It's precisely what was done!
Obviously you put zero price on honesty as you keep dishonestly pretending that Biggs and the rest didn't have a plan even though they directly referenced one.
What I used was an indirect quotation or restatement of what the plan was; I didn't intend it to be a direct quotation obviously.
@wajoma saidNo, I wasn't you idiot. And you saying something untrue, doesn't "acknowledge" it, no matter how many times you do so.
You were quoting yourself, and this has already been acknowledged two times previously, making this the third time.
And no matter how much you dodge, there is nothing "preposterous" about my description of the Proud Boys and other groups who attacked the Capitol on January 6th, plans.
@no1marauder saidMy good self asked:
No, I wasn't you idiot. And you saying something untrue, doesn't "acknowledge" it, no matter how many times you do so.
And no matter how much you dodge, there is nothing "preposterous" about my description of the Proud Boys and other groups who attacked the Capitol on January 6th, plans.
"Who are you quoting here?"
No.1 replied:
"I'm stating what happened except..."
There may well have been a plan, for eg: a plan where to go for a beer later. You made up a plan, put quote marks around it as if it were an admission by someone, the admission came later when you admitted it was your made up plan which you'd like to attribute to someone else but all those someone elses's are denying it, and reaping years of imprisonment for doing so.
@wajoma saidYou're an imbecile.
My good self asked:
"Who are you quoting here?"
No.1 replied:
"I'm stating what happened except..."
There may well have been a plan, for eg: a plan where to go for a beer later. You made up a plan, put quote marks around it as if it were an admission by someone, the admission came later when you admitted it was your made up plan which you'd like to a ...[text shortened]... e else but all those someone elses's are denying it, and reaping years of imprisonment for doing so.
"A plan where to go for a beer later"? LMFAO! How pathetically full of s**t you are.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147477
@no1marauder saidLOL...shytweasels are gonna shytweasel
"Preposterous exaggeration"? It's precisely what was done!
Obviously you put zero price on honesty as you keep dishonestly pretending that Biggs and the rest didn't have a plan even though they directly referenced one.
What I used was an indirect quotation or restatement of what the plan was; I didn't intend it to be a direct quotation obviously.
All of this is from the Indictment the link to which I already provided:
"30. The next day, on December 20, 2020, TARRIO created an encrypted message group called MOSD, which included NORDEAN, BIGGS, REHL, Donohoe, PERSON-2, and PERSON-3. PERSON-I was subsequently added to the message group for MOSD leaders (the "MOSD Leaders Group"😉. TARRIO explained that the MOSD was a "national rally planning committee" [Apparently just for deciding where to have a beer-no1] of the Proud Boys that would include "hand selected members.""
35. On December 27, 2020, NORDEAN created an online crowdfunding campaign that solicited donations for "Protective gear and communications" to be used by the Proud Boys on January 6, 2021. NORDEAN shared a link to this crowdsourcing campaign on his social media page and encouraged others to share it on their social media pages.
36. On December 28, 2020, TARRIO posted a message in the MOSD Prospect Group in which he stated that the "DC trip" would consist of "two groups"-the MOSD and everyone else-and that no one should be in colors.
37. On December 29, 2020, TARRIO posted a message on social media that the Proud Boys planned to "turn out in record numbers on Jan 6th but this time with a twist We will not be wearing our traditional Black and Yellow. We will be incognito and we will be spread across downtown DC in smaller teams. And who knows . . . we might dress in all BLACK for the occasion." At different times, NORDEAN, BIGGS, REHL, and Donohoe reiterated that Proud Boys members should avoid wearing Proud Boys colors on January 6, 2021.
38. On December 29, 2020, TARRIO posted a message to the MOSD Prospect Group to notify prospective members of a virtual meeting on December 30 to explain "how this all works."
REHL warned prospective members that January 6 was going to be a "completely different operation" and that the Proud Boys would not be conducting a "night march and flexing our [arms] and s**t."
45. On January 1, 2021, TARRIO posted separate messages on social media that read, "Let's bring this new year with one word in mind...Revolt" and later, "New Years Revolution."
48. On January 3, 2021, members of the MOSD exchanged messages in the MOSD Members Group various statements about attacking the Capitol. In response to the question, "what would they do [if] 1 million patriots stormed and took the capital building. Shoot into the crowd? I think not," PERSON-3 stated, "They would do nothing because they can do nothing."
56. On January 5, 2021, at 5:25 p.m., BIGGS posted a message to the Boots on Ground group that read, "Just trying to get our numbers. So we can plan accordingly for tonight and go over tomorrow's plan."
60. On Januaiy 5, 2021, at 8:27 p.m., an MOSD member who was in Washington, D.C. with NORDEAN and BIGGS posted a message to New MOSD Members Group that read: "Everyone needs to meet at the Washington Monument at 10am tomorrow morning! Do not be late! Do not wear colors! Details will be laid out at the pre meeting! Come out at as patriot!"
63. At 9:17 p.m., BIGGS posted a message on the New MOSD Leaders Group that read, "We just had a meeting with a lot of guys. Info should be coming out" and then posted "Just spoke with Enrique."
65. At approximately 9:20 p.m., BIGGS posted a message on the New MOSD Leaders Group that read, "We have a plan. I'm with rufio [NORDEAN]." Donohoe responded, "What's the plan so I can pass it to the MOSD guys." BIGGS responded, "I gave Enrique a plan. The one I told the guys and he said he had one."
68. •At 6:37 a.m. on January 6, 2021, Donohoe posted a message to the New MOSD Leaders Group that asked, "Are we gonna do a commanders briefing before the 10 a.m.?"
But hey according to Wajoma there wasn't any plan; heck, it wasn't even a Proud Boys event!
@no1marauder saidNo evidence of what the plan was unless we're to count No1 making one up and quoting himself. But from this statement it looks like there was more than one plan, the one Biggs gave and then 'he said he had one' so the question is what were the details of both plans, and which one is being used to send men to prison?
Biggs: "I gave Enrique a plan. The one I told the guys and he said he had one."
https://www.justice.gov/media/1225801/dl?inline paragraph 63
Paragraph 68 A commanders meeting is referenced.
@no1marauder saidHaha, No.1 typed the word 'plan' into a search, then went loose with the bolding, there's no denying there may well have been a plan, what is needed is the details of the plan, or as has come to light from previously posted statement the details of the, more than one, different and possibly conflicting plans.
All of this is from the Indictment the link to which I already provided:
"30. The next day, on December 20, 2020, TARRIO created an encrypted message group called MOSD, which included NORDEAN, BIGGS, REHL, Donohoe, PERSON-2, and PERSON-3. PERSON-I was subsequently added to the message group for MOSD leaders (the "MOSD Leaders Group"😉. TARRIO explained that the MOSD was ...[text shortened]... [/b]"
But hey according to Wajoma there wasn't any plan; heck, it wasn't even a Proud Boys event!
No evidence.
Everyone has plans, lot's of people plan lots of things 'plan' has not become some majical four letter word that sends a man to jail.
@no1marauder saidCalm down, I didn't say that was the plan, it was an 'for example'.
You're an imbecile.
"A plan where to go for a beer later"? LMFAO! How pathetically full of s**t you are.
Please retract 'imbecile', or there will be no other recourse but to deflect the word back to yourself.
@wajoma said"No evidence"? LMFAO!
Haha, No.1 typed the word 'plan' into a search, then went loose with the bolding, there's no denying there may well have been a plan, what is needed is the details of the plan, or as has come to light from previously posted statement the details of the, more than one, different and possibly conflicting plans.
No evidence.
Everyone has plans, lot's of people plan lots of things 'plan' has not become some majical four letter word that sends a man to jail.
@no1marauder saidThe appears to be evidence of a plan, but not the details of the plan. It's ambiguous but the statement you posted previously indicates more than one plan. If you don't know the details of either plan how do you know which one was being followed?
"No evidence"? LMFAO!