Originally posted by HandyAndy... continuing this foolish thread ad nauseam is only hurting Bobby.
You can ask anything you want about content, you can challenge conclusions, you can offer
opposing arguments, but you do not have the right to demand that the poster disclose his/her
motives for posting.
By the way, continuing this foolish thread ad nauseam is only hurting Bobby.
Is that your motive for posting?
Your concern for him is heartwarming.
Originally posted by HandyAndyGee thats hard to respect Andrew. I think you are afraid. You are afraid of letting anyone get past the moat and scaling the ramparts in case they don't like what they find, so you load the trebuchet with fiery insults to repel anyone that attempts to scale the walls of your castle, hidden high in the hills of cyber space.
You're right, Robbie, I shouldn't call you stupid. Ignorant, maybe, or rude. Or possibly shallow or crass
or ill-mannered or even boorish. Not to mention sneaky and deceitful and dishonest. But not stupid.
07 Aug 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewhen he said stupid he was looking in the mirror.
Gee thats hard to respect Andrew. I think you are afraid. You are afraid of letting anyone get past the moat and scaling the ramparts in case they don't like what they find, so you load the trebuchet with fiery insults to repel anyone that attempts to scale the walls of your castle, hidden high in the hills of cyber space.
Originally posted by lemon limeQuite right. Thankfully someone here is over 10.
[b]Suzianne and Limeboy claimed that I accused Grampy Bobby of plagiarism
I recall you were searching for evidence of plagiarism and thought you had found it. You didn't actually need to come right out and say I hereby accuse GB of plagiarism! for anyone to know what you were doing.
The fact that you didn't actually find the eviden ...[text shortened]... n't mean you weren't looking for it... a 10 year old child could see what you were trying to do.[/b]
I'm not the only one, either. If you had asked anyone who cared about the matter, yes, it was obvious what was going on.
And when I stated this in the other threads, suddenly they mysteriously vanished. You do the math.
07 Aug 14
Originally posted by HandyAndyYou didn't have to. Everyone knew what was going on.
Then cite one specific instance when I said or even hinted that I was searching for evidence of plagiarism
by Bobby. Since the threads have been removed, paraphrase it. Prove that you aren't a contemptible liar.
Your mistake is that you then assumed you were totally in the clear.
07 Aug 14
Originally posted by FMFAnd the *only* reason he would think it then okay to expose GB's screen name on that other website is because he thought GB guilty of plagiarism.
The poem [and others] had been posted here at RHP several times and also elsewhere on the net under a different name.
An eye for an eye. That fits HA. If he had not thought GB guilty of plagiarism, he'd at least have thought twice about exposing his name on that other website. As it is, he thought he had GB dead to rights and so felt justified in doing this despicable behavior.
But you know all this.
07 Aug 14
Originally posted by FMFMisdirection again. Focusing on minutia. All but outright lying.
It is Suzianne who seems to be under the impression that I was behind the deletion of the threads. It is Suzianne who has been trying to make it "something to do with [me]".
The fact is that you are trying to make it seem as if I cared those threads were deleted. That's not what this is about. At all. If anything, the deletion of those threads was a convenient sideshow.