@kellyjay saidBy "God", of course, you are referring to the particular God figure that you prefer.
Give me something you are using to reject the notion God created everything and then made life, how do you know?
Isn't it a bit narcissistic for you to believe that, if the "evidence" for your particular God figure is good enough for you then it should be good enough for every other human being?
And then doesn't that narcissism become more than a bit malignant when you also believe that people who don't find what is good-enough-for-you to be good-enough-for-them somehow "deserve" to be tormented in burning flames for eternity?
Have you forgotten that the first and last issue was discussed pretty seriously a while back? That's why I don't always answer questions that we've already discussed. It get's old my friend.
Don't bluff me.
Don't bluff me with a yawn.
I answered your questions quite directly I think.
I did not say "O, that again? That is so OLD, so addressed once upon a time long ago."
Still waiting for more proof that Michael the archangel is the one I received when I received Jesus into my heart.
Galveston what is old and badly failed is that Christians received Michael the archangel in their being begotten of God.
"But as many as received Him, to them He gave the authority to become children of God, to those who believe into His name,
Who were begotten not of blood,
nor of the will of the flesh,
not of the will of man,
but of God." John (1:12,13)
Now you have either arguably an X-student here in Rajk999, or he has been influenced by some of your old Arian teachings somehow. That is the teachings which Charles T. Russell took up to continue.
He says no one is born of the Spirit until the resurrection at the second coming of Christ. To you and he I point out "that as many as received Him ... were BEGOTTEN ... of God"
They WERE begotten in their past. They are not waiting to be born of God as far as their innermost spiritual being is concerned.
Have you never considered that the term "the first and the last" might just apply to them both?
I have. It is YOU who doesn't believe that THE First and THE Last are both Jehovah in Isaiah and Jehovah in Revelation. That is Jehovah who became a man.
We were told "the Word was with God, and the Word was God"
Christians believe. Jehovah Witnesses rebel and reject.
They would have different meanings,
I don't accept that "The First and the Last" has a fluctuating meaning.
There can only be ONE terminal origin and ONE terminal conclusion.
God is the One "out from Him ... and to Him are all things"
"Because out from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever. Amen." (Rom. 11:36)
Compare that with Revelation 5:13 when the UNIVERSAL worship is rendered to "God and to the Lamb" forever and ever.
"And every creature which is in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea and all things in them, I heard saying,
To Him who sits upon the throne and to the Lamb be the blessing and the honor and the glory and the might forever and ever." (Rev. 5:13)
Your organization is in rebellion. You reject worship forever and ever of the Triune God - of Him on the throne and the Lamb the Redeemer God-man.
You are in rebellion.
but that term is not just meant for one of them. But you have to understand what they are first, right?
Equal glory and praise are rendered to the Father and the Son in Revelation 7:13 universally. The Triune God is the First and the Last.
"Apart from Me there is no God".
Watchtower's so-called "faithful and prudent servant" is in rebellion there as well. For they sent you to teach that "the Word" was a god. But apart from Jehovah there is no god. (Isa. 44:6)
"Thus says Jehovah ... I am the First and the Last, And apart from Me there is no god."
How long will you pretend to have some logical higher ground?
Here ya go:
“The Alpha and the Omega” refers to Jehovah God, the Almighty. This term occurs three times in the Bible.—Revelation 1:8; 21:6; 22:13. *
Why does God call himself “the Alpha and the Omega”?
Revelation 1:8 - The Alpha and the Omega ... who is coming.
It most certainly refers to the One in the previous verse 7 Who is seen coming with the clouds.
"Behold, HE COMES with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the land will mourn over Him. ..."[/b]
The very next sentence informs us that it is "the Almighty" who is coming.
Revelation 21:6 is said by "He who sits on the throne" (v.5)
But in Revelation 19:5 a voice comes out from the throne who is one of us for He speaks of "our God".
"And a voice came out from the throne saying, Praise OUR God, all His slaves and those who fear Him, the small and the great." (Rev. 19:5)
This could be the voice of the God-man Jesus. It would be exactly a fulfillment of Hebrews 1:8 which says the Son is God and is also anointed with exultant joy above His redeemed partners, meaning He is God and He is man.
"But of the Son, Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, ... therefore God, Your God, has anointed You with the oil of exultant joy above Your partners." (See Hebrews 1:8,9)
This would be consistent with Revelation telling us that the voice out from the throne of God said He was the Alpha and the Omega AND that we, His people, should as partners with the Son, join Him to "Praise our God".
We are told that it is God who sits upon the throne.
"And the twenty-four elders and the four living creatures fell down and worshipped God, who sits upon the throne, ..." (Rev. 19:4)
Alpha and omega are the first and last letters of the alphabet in Greek,
I believe the implication is that Christ is the beginning and the end and everything we need in between. God became a man not only to be our Redeemer but to be our LIFE.
"In Him was life, and the life was the light of men." (John 1:4)
It is good that you recognize God, out there, objectively as our Creator. But you rebel against God coming to be our eternal and divine life. You rebel against the God Who is "the resurrection and the life" (John 11:25)
The last Adam became a divine life imparting Spirit to give us Himself as eternal life.
"the last Adam [Christ] became a life giving Spirit" (1 Cor. 15:45b)
God therefore is not only the unique First and Last. But He is everything we need as the entire alphabet. In Him only is all existence spelled so as to make meaning.
the language used to write the part of the Bible commonly called the New Testament, which includes the book of Revelation. The respective positions of these letters in the Greek alphabet are used to illustrate that Jehovah alone is the beginning and the end. (Revelation 21:6) He was Almighty God in the infinite past, and he will continue to be Almighty God forever. He is the only one who is “from everlasting to everlasting.”—Psalm 90:2.
The One Who comes forth to be King in Israel has His days from everlasting, from the days of eternity.
" ... O Bethlehem, Ephrathah, So little to be among the thousands of Judah, From you there will come forth to Me He who is to be Ruler of Israel;
his goings forth are from ancient times, From the days of eternity." (Micah 5:2)
The "Word was with God" from eternity!
And "the Word was God" from eternity as well.
Your organization and its so-called "faithful and prudent servant" are in rebellion.
Who is “the first and the last”?
Jehovah God - Jesus Christ.
The Bible applies this term both to Jehovah God and to his Son, Jesus, but with different meanings. Consider two examples.
At Isaiah 44:6, Jehovah says: “I am the first and I am the last. There is no God but me.” Here Jehovah highlights that he is the everlasting true God; besides him, there is no other. (Deuteronomy 4:35, 39) In this case, then, the expression “the first and the last” has the same meaning as “the Alpha and the Omega.”
God is the First and the Last. The Word Who was with God and was God is the First and the Last.
Besides Him there is no god.
Additionally, the term “the First [pro’tos, not alpha] and the Last [e’skha·tos, not omega]” occurs at Revelation 1:17, 18 and 2:8. In these verses, the context shows that the one referred to died and later returned to life.
The Word was with God. And the Word was God.
"And the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us ..." (John 1:14a) .
He became flesh that He might be able to DIE.
He is God, making the significance and efficacy of His death have eternal significance.
I stop here for length's sake.
@sonship saidI could show you all the proof in the world on any spiritual subject but if you're not wanting to see it, you won't because Jehovah will not let you....
@galveston75
Have you forgotten that the first and last issue was discussed pretty seriously a while back? That's why I don't always answer questions that we've already discussed. It get's old my friend.
Don't bluff me.
Don't bluff me with a yawn.
I answered your questions quite directly I think.
I did not say "O, that again? That is so OLD, so add ...[text shortened]... for more proof that Michael the archangel is the one I received when I received Jesus into my heart.
@kellyjay saidI assert that I do not know .
Unfounded, and you only have another assertion! Give me something you are using to reject the notion God created everything and then made life, how do you know? There has to be something outside maybe someone else created it?
I further assert that you do not know.
I don't know how to say this any other way, but you seem to be saying "Lalalalalala goddidit " . You have your belief, but have zero actual proof . The "god of the gaps " is your savior and you are welcome to it .
@caissad4 saidIf you don’t know on what are you going to that shows you anyone else does not know? You have to have some reason for you to work it out and come to any conclusions. I have not offered you anything resembling gaps I have brought up two specific things with cause; however, you bring up you don’t know and assume that is a reasonable accretion or justification for your opinion.
I assert that I do not know .
I further assert that you do not know.
I don't know how to say this any other way, but you seem to be saying "Lalalalalala goddidit " . You have your belief, but have zero actual proof . The "god of the gaps " is your savior and you are welcome to it .
I could show you all the proof in the world on any spiritual subject but if you're not wanting to see it, you won't because Jehovah will not let you....
No, that is not what is going on student of Charles Russell and Judge Rutherford.
What is going on is that like the Pharisees, the scribes, the lawyers, the chief priests who called for Christ to be condemned, they wanted to stay in the old covenant.
It is better then atheism perhaps. But it is rebellion against the new covenant.
And it is noted that NO EFFORT is being made to justify using Michael the archangel as a stand in for the Son of God Jesus Christ.
Either you or robbie made some effort in the past perhaps. You yourself know that you have terribly THIN ground to substitute Michael the angel in the place of Christ.
Rutherford and Russell have cheated you.
Galveston,
Three questions for you. Can you answer them?
1.) If someone becomes a Jehovah's Witness are they REQUIRED to believe in 1919 Joseph Rutherford was chosen to be God's mouthpiece?
2.) At this point right now what do you teach will happen to me at Armageddon?
3.) Are you allowed to treat your unbelieving family members who are not Jehovah's Witnesses the same as believing ones? Or do you have to by requirement shun them?
And you may ask me anything about the fellowship I have with the local churches.
@kellyjay saidYour definition of proof is clearly different than mine .
If you don’t know on what are you going to that shows you anyone else does not know? You have to have some reason for you to work it out and come to any conclusions. I have not offered you anything resembling gaps I have brought up two specific things with cause; however, you bring up you don’t know and assume that is a reasonable accretion or justification for your opinion.
Your definition of evidence is different than mine .
And you do not have any understanding of the phrase "god of the gaps " .
Little wonder you are incapable of understanding much of what I post.
@sonship saidTry to stay on the subject.
Galveston,
Three questions for you. Can you answer them?
1.) If someone becomes a Jehovah's Witness are they REQUIRED to believe in 1919 Joseph Rutherford was chosen to be God's mouthpiece?
2.) At this point right now what do you teach will happen to me at Armageddon?
3.) Are you allowed to treat your unbelieving family members who are no ...[text shortened]... ment shun them?
And you may ask me anything about the fellowship I have with the local churches.
Try to stay on the subject.
Okay.
My subject, there are greater things God accomplishes in His universe once it has been created.
Incarnation is one.
Living a perfect human life amidst a sinful world is another.
Becoming the Redeemer is another.
Rising from the dead is anther.
Becomming the indwelling divine life to the redeemed is another.
Building up the New Jerusalem as the union and mingling of God and man to be His habitation of God in spirit is another.
With the universe, He only needed to speak it into existence.
But with some of His creatures with free will, their own minds, their own opinions, their own will, desires, intentions, etc are sentient beings God accomplished His eternal purpose to become their living dwelling place and living temple forever.
These were greater acts of God then those of creation.
That's my subject.
@sonship Thanks for stopping for lengths sake. Whew!!!
"Your organization is in rebellion. You reject worship forever and ever of the Triune God - of Him on the throne and the Lamb the Redeemer God-man.
You are in rebellion."
Well yes we are. We have cleaned house so to say with all the paganistic teachings and doctrines that the churches still hang on too. So yes we've changed and have rid ourselves of what is not biblical, have nothing to do with the politics of the world, will not fight in mans wars and do all we can to do exactly as Jesus said.
So sorry buddy you have an issue with those things. It is not you are anyone here that we are trying to impress or be friends with or slink down into submission because of the pressure you and others would like to put on ones who have rejected your false teachings.
@caissad4
Is it me or do I perceive that you evade my questions toward you as a habit?
Here's one that should be a simple one for you?
Are you free to decide what you believe? Or is what you believe of no credit to you but completely have to do interactions of atoms and molecules in the gray matter of your brain ?
Take a moment from Kellyjay and handle that on for us please.
@sonship said
@caissad4
Is it me or do I perceive that you evade my questions toward you as a habit?
It is you .
Are you free to decide what you believe?
To a degree yes and to a degree no.
Or is what you believe of no credit to you but completely have to do interactions of atoms and molecules in the gray matter of your brain ?
To a degree yes and to a degree no .