Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf it's not your personal belief why are you propagating it here?
sure there is nothing but it does not negate what it is, personally believe? oh dear, i know you dont really do evidence but this should put to flight the rather flimsy assertion that my argument is based on personal belief,
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut the evidence here is that they do not invest "pagan meaning" in the crucifix. A symbol only represents the meaning that people invest in it, nothing more and nothing less. And this is so regardless of how strongly your personal feelings are on this matter.
fine we understand that if they sprinkle it with Holy water its good to go and yet it cannot negate the facts that it is a pagan symbol. Are they also reticent about examining evidence?
Originally posted by FMFso you keep saying and yet it does not negate what it is effhim. I provided evidence which you have ignored and continue to assert that its a personal matter, how pathetic. (in the original sense of the word)
But the evidence here is that they do not invest "pagan meaning" in the crucifix. A symbol only represents the meaning that people invest in it, nothing more and nothing less. And this is so regardless of how strongly your personal feelings are on this matter.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat evidence did you provide about what the crucifix symbolizes to Indonesian Christians? None. You provided a link to a text written by someone you agree with. He said absolutely nothing about Indonesian Christians.
so you keep saying and yet it does not negate what it is effhim. I provided evidence which you have ignored ad continue to assert that its a personal matter, how pathetic.