208d
@Cliff-Mashburn saidWhy should a particular section of land be assumed to belong to anyone in particular?
@shavixmir
Maybe they are sick of Muslims and Africans taking over their country.
Who should own that land- the indigenous?
What does it mean to take over a country?
The truth is people in the UK are unhappy about the disparity of wealth. We know we're a rich nation, buy we're seeing an increasing number of street homeless, towns are becoming over crowded with house building, food banks and other charity need is increasing. It doesn't take much from a strong speaker (remember Hitler? Well, we've got a fella goes by 'Tommy Robinson' who can talk to a crowd of unhappy just as well as Hitler talked to a nation of unhappy before WW2) for the crowd to become enthused. Especially when alcohol is involved and particularly if they uneducated on history.
The adverage worker sees a quarter of their earnings taxed/paid to insure themselves. Those on millions are meant to pay half, but we're an island and it's not so hard to hide money offsure and avoid the Tax. So that's what big business do. We also have old laws that keep money in families and of course, the royalty (though, they've cut back and the main ones do attract money into the country).
208d
@mike69 saidWho's topic are you focusing on Mike?
You have hate my friend don’t kid yourself.
Just one two second find of the actual topics brought up.
Congress finds the following:
(1) In 2016 and 2017, the Palestinian Author- ity published modified curricula for school- aged children in grades 1 through 11.
(2) Textbooks used by the Palestinian Au- thority (PA) in the West Bank and Gaza in- clude graphics portraying vi ...[text shortened]... toward other countries or ethnic groups from the curriculum used in their schools.
SEC. 4. REPORTS
We don't have a Congress in the UK.
We and a few other Europeans invaded a lovely continent, called it America and they now have a Congress.
208d
1 edit
-Removed-No I don't. I've said before, I agree with the Greens. Benefits is no exception.
No child should be growing up in poverty in the UK. It's disgraceful isn't it.
Do you know about it Dive,
Please read this:
https://cpag.org.uk/child-poverty/poverty-facts-and-figures
Edit: btw, it's not child benefit that's capped at two children. It's the Universal Credit child element. UC is means tested, and parents on it are economically encouraged to not have more that 2 children. If only all parents could predict the future, they're all being encouraged to know, should something happen (like their husband leaves, for example) that, if they one day need income based benefit, they'd be wise to only have two children.