Go back
Napoleonic Empires: Game Thread

Napoleonic Empires: Game Thread

General

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
01 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by nook7
WTF?

Spain, you are going down with you allies, my battles are currently being fought on captured territory - no enemy has tread on Russias hallowed turf - jeez - l have even had 2 of your provinces - the proverbial town bike in Spain!
Yeah. My comment should be taken in the context of my proclamation this turn. 😉

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
01 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
The king of Spain, asking the hard questions.
The irony is that had the Southern Alliance been winning, it'd be in exactly the same boat -- thankfully, at the moment survival is of the essence -- and maybe administering a painful enema to Northerners while going down.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
So which one is it going to be? Sweden or Russia?
Neither. I do not need to turn on either of my allies to win; two of us need only amass 640 Gold provinces. That is obtainable without betraying anyone. France is already broken and soon most of mainland Spain will fall as well. The Spanish-Neapolitian force in Germany will soon be rolled back and then the Alliance can turn its full attention on our only serious threats in Naples and Turkey, as your territory is rapidly being occupied by the Alliance and your forces destroyed with little hope of replacing your losses.

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
01 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Neither. I do not need to turn on either of my allies to win; two of us need only amass 640 Gold provinces. That is obtainable without betraying anyone. France is already broken and soon most of mainland Spain will fall as well. The Spanish-Neapolitian force in Germany will soon be rolled back and then the Alliance can turn its full attention on our only ...[text shortened]... ng occupied by the Alliance and your forces destroyed with little hope of replacing your losses.
Okay..... so Sweden or Russia will have to be satisfied being the third wheel -- doing a bit of your fighting without the prospect of walking away a winner at the end of the day. Perhaps you fellas should call a conference of the “Big Three” ala WWII and decide who’ll be the grudging loser.

Here's a though: maybe Russia and the Ottomans should call a truce, sign an alliance, bite Prussia in the rear with all those gold-rich provinces ripe for the taking and end up unlikely winners while Naples and what's left of Spain harry the Prussian juggernaut with its Swedish lackey to the point of boredom. 😛

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Halitose
Okay..... so Sweden or Russia will have to be satisfied being the third wheel -- doing a bit of your fighting without the prospect of walking away a winner at the end of the day. Perhaps you fellas should call a conference of the “Big Three” ala WWII and decide who’ll be the grudging loser.

Here's a though: maybe Russia and the Ottomans should call a t ...[text shortened]... of Spain harry the Prussian juggernaut with its Swedish lackey to the point of boredom. 😛
Why would Russia ally with another major power (putting it in the same situation vis-a-vis victory conditions) when the Ottomans have about 1/2 the Gold value of Prussia and a much smaller army and fleet? Their chances of victory are far higher maintaining their present alliance; between the two of us we need only 132 more Gold province value, while with the Ottomans they would need 288. Your proposal makes about as much sense as scuttling a fleet.

d

Canberra, Australia

Joined
07 Jan 03
Moves
19005
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Why would Russia ally with another major power (putting it in the same situation vis-a-vis victory conditions) when the Ottomans have about 1/2 the Gold value of Prussia and a much smaller army and fleet? Their chances of victory are far higher maintaining their present alliance; between the two of us we need only 132 more Gold province value, while wit ...[text shortened]... the Ottomans they would need 288. Your proposal makes about as much sense as scuttling a fleet.
The Ottomans and the Russians could form a winning coalition.

n

Joined
14 May 03
Moves
89724
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Eitherway Naples is going to be mincemeat!

d

Canberra, Australia

Joined
07 Jan 03
Moves
19005
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by nook7
Eitherway Naples is going to be mincemeat!
I'm going to form a winning coalition with myself.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
The Ottomans and the Russians could form a winning coalition.
Which is a more plausible winning coalition:

A) Ottomans and Russia: OR

B) Prussia and Russia


?????

And why do Naples and Spain suddenly care soooooooooooo much?

d

Canberra, Australia

Joined
07 Jan 03
Moves
19005
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Which is a more plausible winning coalition:

A) Ottomans and Russia: OR

B) Prussia and Russia


?????

And why do Naples and Spain suddenly care soooooooooooo much?
Would you consider betraying your nephew? If not, then A).

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
Would you consider betraying your nephew? If not, then A).
How??? Russia and the Ottomans need 288 Gold provinces; where do you think they can get them? By conquering ALL of Prussian territory??

d

Canberra, Australia

Joined
07 Jan 03
Moves
19005
Clock
02 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
How??? Russia and the Ottomans need 288 Gold provinces; where do you think they can get them? By conquering ALL of Prussian territory??
You asked which possibility was more plausible, didn't you? Unless you're willing to stab Sweden in the back, the other option wins by default.



Edit: I presume the answer to the question "Would you consider betraying your nephew?" is no.

n

Joined
14 May 03
Moves
89724
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dyl
I'm going to form a winning coalition with myself.
As long as your allies agree!

d

Canberra, Australia

Joined
07 Jan 03
Moves
19005
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by nook7
As long as your allies agree!
Murat doesn't need allies!

AThousandYoung
He didn't...Diddy?

tinyurl.com/2p9w6j3b

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26701
Clock
02 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

If you survive to the end, it counts as a draw.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.