01 Jun 12
Originally posted by galveston75Yes, jaywill uses the name Jehovah, because of the misuse of it by the King James translators, just like the Jehovah's Witnesses do. But he knows the "I AM" that visited Moses in the burning bush and gave Moses the Ten Commandments is the pre-incarnate Christ.
And guess what? It's the truth and you as of yet proved to the contrary it isn't. Even your friend JayWill uses the name Jehovah in most of his postings, yet you never attack him on that.
But in fact NO ONE takes yopu seriously on much of anything. So nothing new here either but I still wonder why you take the time to post at all? No one listens to anything you say other then for a good laugh or two..
http://www.angelfire.com/tx5/jeansptx/preinc.htm
01 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHinds*&%^^%$@# That's what this sillyness sounds like by you as usual. Prove it by scripture. No not actually, don't bother as you've tried before and you completely misquoted them as usual, so don't bother.
Yes, jaywill uses the name Jehovah, because of the misuse of it by the King James translators, just like the Jehovah's Witnesses do. But he knows the "I AM" that visited Moses in the burning bush and gave Moses the Ten Commandments is the pre-incarnate Christ.
http://www.angelfire.com/tx5/jeansptx/preinc.htm
Also it seems you and RAJK are the only two perfect translators of the Bible by what you both say, except for that dang trinity thing which he disagrees with you everytime. So I wonder who's right? Interesting huh?
01 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75the 'I am', is not even proper English nevermind an accurate translation. Same old
*&%^^%$@# That's what this sillyness sounds like by you as usual. Prove it by scripture. No not actually, don't bother as you've tried before and you completely misquoted them as usual, so don't bother.
Also it seems you and RAJK are the only two perfect translators of the Bible by what you both say, except for that dang trinity thing which he disagrees with you everytime. So I wonder who's right? Interesting huh?
trinitarian dogma which relies upon a mistranslation of scripture, do you think that
Baptists will ever revise any of their teachings?
01 Jun 12
Originally posted by divegeesterSure. We used to do many of the things that false religions still do but as time went on and God letting us see how the Bible condemns these things, we have pulled away and cleanzed ourselves of them. This is all very clear in the Bible that as time would go on, the light of knowledge and understanding the Bible, which many here have confussed that they don't, would get "brighter and brighter".
Can you give some examples of how the JW organisation is "progressive" in this context?
So unlike most so called Christian religions that fell for such false doctrines as the trinity, christmas, hell fire, the immortal soul, still being ruled by a clergy class and just general confusion of those beliefs and why they are even taught and can't even come close to explaining them to someone who ask for a simple explination of those beliefs, we have left those man made and demonic inspired false beliefs behind and have washed our hands and minds of them and have now progressed to the point that we do understand the Bible and are able to make clear headed decisions to avoid those paganistic teachings that most so called Christian churches still to this day teach and believe.
Plus we clearly understand the commission work of teaching at every door on the planet that Jesus himself taught and did himself. We do also understand that most so called Christians "do not see this as an important issue at all" but that is their decision whether or not they wish to join in with this life saving work that will be done and that is to find anyone, anywhere that is looking to gain the truthful knowledge that the Bible holds out for a much better future and to also learn the truths in the Bible.
So......I'd say we've progressed along right well and we are always waiting with eagerness for more clear truths from God for his followers to learn.
Hows that?
01 Jun 12
Originally posted by divegeesterNo clue huh? Ok I'm taking the time out to give you a few scriptures. If you actually care, look them up, pray to God for guidence and see what you come up with. If you do pray to God but do not use his name which is Jehovah, it will not work. But give it a shot anyway.
Why not just answer the question(s) instead of obfuscating all the time?
Heb 5:11-14, 6:1,2.
Eph 4:14, 5:15-17.
2 Cor 13:5.
1Cor 14:20.
1Tim 4:15.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121650
01 Jun 12
4 edits
Originally posted by galveston75Heb 5:11-14
No clue huh? Ok I'm taking the time out to give you a few scriptures. If you actually care, look them up, pray to God for guidence and see what you come up with. If you do pray to God but do not use his name which is Jehovah, it will not work. But give it a shot anyway.
Heb 5:11-14, 6:1,2.
Eph 4:14, 5:15-17.
2 Cor 13:5.
1Cor 14:20.
1Tim 4:15.
We have much to say about this, but it is hard to make it clear to you because you no longer try to understand. 12 In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! 13 Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. 14 But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
This is first one I looked at; how is this a scripture about being "progessive" in the context of robbies post about "revised teachings"?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 121650
01 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75I know what you believe now.
So unlike most so called Christian religions that fell for such false doctrines as the trinity, christmas, hell fire, the immortal soul, still being ruled by a clergy class and just general confusion of those beliefs and why they are even taught and can't even come close to explaining them to someone who ask for a simple explination of those beliefs, we ...[text shortened]... aganistic teachings that most so called Christian churches still to this day teach and believe.
You mention "other so-called Christian churches" and make a list of what they believe now and how that makes them false in your eyes; what progression has the JW organisation specifically demonstrated where it once believed something and now it does not. E.I "progression".
01 Jun 12
Originally posted by galveston75Rajk999 disagrees with me on the Trinity? How could that be? It is clear from Scripture that that there is ONE GOD with ONE NAME in THREE PERSONS who are the FATHER, the SON, and the HOLY SPIRIT.
*&%^^%$@# That's what this sillyness sounds like by you as usual. Prove it by scripture. No not actually, don't bother as you've tried before and you completely misquoted them as usual, so don't bother.
Also it seems you and RAJK are the only two perfect translators of the Bible by what you both say, except for that dang trinity thing which he disagrees with you everytime. So I wonder who's right? Interesting huh?
HalleluYAH !!! Praise the LORD!
02 Jun 12
Originally posted by divegeesterI take it you didn't pray to Jehovah for understanding? What about the other scriptures?
Heb 5:11-14
[i]We have much to say about this, but it is hard to make it clear to you because you no longer try to understand. 12 In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! 13 Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is ...[text shortened]... scripture about being "progessive" in the context of robbies post about "revised teachings"?